|Home||American Libraries | Canadian Libraries | Universal Library | Community Texts | Project Gutenberg | Children's Library | Biodiversity Heritage Library | Additional Collections|
|Anonymous User (login or join us)|
Author: Tom Watson, 1915, Watson's Magazine, Jeffersonian Publishing Company
Keywords: Leo Frank; Mary Phagan; Tom Watson; 1915; Atlanta; Georgia; Watson Magazine; Jeffersonian; Jim Conley; Pedophile; Strangulation; ADL; Anti-Defamation League; B'nai B'rith; Jew; Jewish; Anti-Semitism; Judaism; Racism
Publisher: Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga.
Book contributor: Senator Thomas Edward Watson
Notes: Original copies of magazine are extremely rare.
Macro Man -
Subject: is the verdict of guilt correct?
I wish Watson would have been on the State's prosecution team. His genius intellect expressed in his arguments and invective would have convinced any sane jury to convict Leo Frank. God Bless Saint Mary Anne Phagan.
Subject: Tom Watson Solves the Murder of Mary Phagan Bringing Close to the Leo M. Frank Case
Tom Watson Solves the Murder of Mary Phagan and brings the Leo M. Frank cold case to a close in his best analysis of the trial, September, 1915.
Tom Watson was a controversial southern patriot, lawyer, politician and writer, who championed the poor and working class. He is hated by Jews because he exposed their genetically innate treacherous behavior to the masses of people, both black and white.
Members of the Leo Frank cult do not want you to read his writing, so they will use politically correct scare tactics using words like KKK and anti-semite to get you to pee pee and poo poo in your pants, but if you don't pee pee and poo poo in your pants because of those words you will read his works. If you do read his writings you will realize why Jews hate him so much, because Tom Watson made a complicated trial easy to understand.
Leo Frank did something no other pedophile murderer did in the history of the human race, he made a virtual murder confession during his trial.
To learn more about the August 18, 1913, Leo Frank murder confession read the final closing arguments of Hugh Dorsey and Frank Hooper in American State Trials Volume 10 from 1918, by John D. Lawson. There you will see how Dorsey and Hooper articulate the Leo Frank murder confession. Though Tom Watson, provides a much better interpretation of the August 18, 1913, Leo Frank murder confession in 1915.
When Frank told the jury he must have
been at the 2nd floor toilet during the
five minutes that Monteen waited in his
empty office 12:05 to 12:10, the jury
must have felt the cold chills run up
their spines, for the jury knew that Mary
had not "unconsciously" gone to the toilet,
at the same time Frank did!
What Leo M. Frank, the doomed man, and his
bewildered lawyers failed to see was this:
It was just as necessary for Leo Frank to
explain WHERE MARY WAS, while Monteen Stover
waited, as to explain HIS OWN DISAPPEARANCE,
at that fatal time between 12:05 and 12:10.
Frank's repeated statements entrapped himself
beyond escape. He said, again and again, that
Mary came next after Hattie Hall (who left at
noon), and Leo Frank did not mention seeing
Monteen Stover (who was in Frank's office from
12:05 to 12:10) coming at all. This proved to
the jury that he did not know of Monteen Stover's
And he would have known it, had he been in his
2nd floor office, when he said he was. Now,
as he had (in ignorance of Monteen's visit)
placed both Mary and himself in his office —
while Monteen waited — he had deliberately
and repeatedly lied as to Mary's whereabouts,
as well as his own. He might have "unconsciously"
gone to the toilet. Very well; but where
did Mary Phagan go people are asking?
Because Mary Phagan's hair, and her blood, and
the only possible explanation of the wounds —
the swollen eye in front, and the scalp cut on
the back of the head, ranging from down upward —
were all back there at the metal department,
where the toilet was Leo Frank entrapped himself.
Infatuated young degenerate! To
escape Monteen Stovers evidence, and to
explain his absence from his office, he
supposed himself to have gone, "un-
consciously," to the only place in his
business where there were damning evi-
dences of the crime in the 2nd floor
Leo Frank confessed to murdering Mary Phagan on August 18, 1913 at his own murder trial.
Something no one has ever done in history.
see the closing arguments of prosecution lawyers in American State Trials Volume X 1918 by John D. Lawson LLD and then compare it with Leo Frank's trial statement about an "unconscious" bathroom visit.
Subject: Again, please consider the source - bigots always lie
As much as they try to portray Tom Watson's bigotry and outright lies as fact, the more I urge you to actually read his writings. They are laced with bigotry. How can they base their claims on Frank's guilt on a proven bigot, lyncher, anti-semite, racist?
Subject: Please find out about what a bigot Watson was, and how he polluted this trial
It's really amazing that folks say Tom Watson's writing shows Leo Frank had a fair trial. I invite you all to look into those writings. They incited hatred, bullied witnesses, bullied jurors, led a bald, proudly anti-semitic charge to lynch Frank, called for the re-formation of the KKK....The credibility of the source matters.
Subject: No yielding to Jewish/Psychopath Pressure
The magazine shows that Leo Frank was given a fair trial. Back in those days, they didn't take that kind of rubbish from these demons. Sadly, it is very different nowadays. Leo Frank got what he deserved and the ADL trying to pin the blame on a black guy just will not cut it.
Subject: Please check out the biased source
Tom Watson was not an objective analyst. He was a bigot, a KKK supporter, anti-Catholic, and anti-semitic. Read some of his other writings on these subjects, but take some anti-nausea medicine first. He called for and then celebrated the lynching of Leo Frank. The NY Times at the time said he was responsible for the lynching. I have no idea why the guy who posted this material is all over this site on a crusade to champion Tom Watson, but the guy was a simply a bigot.
Subject: Unrivaled Analysis of Trial Testimony
By far and away the best analysis of the Leo M. Frank trial testimony with an unashamed and rare wit and sarcasm. Not one single contemporary book can claim to offer a better scutiny of the testimony in the Leo M.Frank murder trial as Watson's September 1915 analysis.
Subject: That is Quite a Title
Many in the Kaiser's Army were Jewish . Guess that didn't matter , even at this early point .
|Rights:||Not in copyright. Physical copies are extremely rare.|
|Ocr:||ABBYY FineReader 8.0|